Saturday, November 18, 2017

John Hinderaker Renews His "Tax Cuts Pay For Themselves With Growth" Nonsense

It's been awhile since John "Everything I wrote about economics for an entire year was wrong" Hinderaker has written about economics.  The respite has been glorious.  But now that Republicans in the House have passed a tax bill, ol' John has to tell us that they will lead to glorious growth.

I have one word for him: KANSAS.  Sam Brownback tried this over the last 5 years in his state and it failed.  Miserably.  For more on this, please see Menzie Chen's writing over at Econbrowser.

But more to the point, the whole "tax cuts made the 80s the most amazing economic growth miracle since the beginning of time pure trope.  Let's look at the overall pace of growth:

Above is a chart from the FRED database (which John still can't seem to locate) that shows the Y/Y percentage change in real GDP.  On the really funny side, notice that the pace of growth under Carter was higher on a Y/Y pace than Reagan.  John never seems to mention that.  And yes, growth in the 1980s was good.  But after the initial acceleration (which is more a function of statistics than actual numbers) growth occurred at/near/around its historical trend.

So, was this a function of tax cuts?  The Kansas experiment tells us that, no, it probably wasn't.  Clinton raised taxes in the 1990s and the economy still grew.  Bush II cut taxes and growth declined.  Taxes were over 90% during the 1950s and 70% in the 1960s, yet we still had solid growth.  So, between the pure experiment of Kansas and the historical record, we can say that tax rates don't seem to have the impact we thought.

So, what caused growth?  Let's start with this chart:

Notice that when the Federal Reserve raises rates (usually to slow inflation), the economy slows.  Imagine that.  Its' almost like there's a relationship there or something.

And as for Saint Ronnie Reagan, remember that he loved to spend government money just like a real Keynesean.  However, he liked to spend it on the military:

Ron primed the pump with a massive increase in defense spending.  So, Uncle Ronnie loved to spend money just like the tax and spend liberals.

So, what really caused growth?

I present you with the labor force participation rate, a statistic that Republicans magically found during Obama's presidency.   Econ 101: potential GDP = population growth+productivity growth.  More people + an increasing ability to produce more stuff equals how much we're going to grow.  During the 1980s and 1990s two demographic trends hit: the baby boomers began their prime earnings years and women increased their economic participation.  The combination was powerful.  It's also why we're now slowing: women are leaving the labor force and the baby boomers are retiring.

None of this matters to John.  He's been economically illiterate since the beginning of time and still continues to write about the subject.  But for others, this data might be important.


Friday, November 17, 2017

Housing slowdown looks like it is ending

 - by New Deal democrat

I'll have a much more detailed report next week at, but here's the bullet point summary of this morning's housing permits and starts report:

  • single family permits made a new expansion high
  • single family starts made a new expansion high
  • total permits were just shy of their expansion high from last winter
  • the three month moving average of total starts, which smooths out volatility, made a new expansion high
  • the number of units for which a permit has been issued, but which have not yet been started, made a new expansion high

In short, this was an excellent report. It looks like the slowdown in housing that was brought about by the increase in mortgage rates one year ago is abating, as the demographic tailwind continues to assert itself. Meanwhile YoY interest rates are potentially within days of being lower, which will be a boon.

More next week.

Thursday, November 16, 2017

Industrial production and real retail sales evidence of strong underlying trend

 - by New Deal democrat

A couple of weeks ago I wrote:
Dallas Fed and the Chicago PMI both improved even more from September to October: ... As a result, even taking into account that these have been outperforming industrial production this year, it is likely that manufacturing production when it is reported for October several weeks from now will be a positive, and most likely slightly better than last month's.
The average of the four non-southern regional Fed manufacturing indexes was +20. The Chicago PMI was 66.2, which translates to +32.4. The average was roughly +22, which translates to +.4 in the industrial production manufacturing index. Even subtracting a few tenths of a percent still gave a positive number.

Well, overall industrial production, and the manufacturing index, both came in strong for October:

While some of this may be a hurricane related rebound, the above regional calculations show that the underlying national trend remains quite positive.

A similar situation obtains with regard to real retail sales.  The overall number was up +0.1%:

But even if we subtract out autos, given the need to replace ruined vehicles, real retail sales while not higher, maintained the big increase from September:

So the Doomers can't use the hurricanes as an excuse. Right now the economy is hitting on almost all cylinders (wage growth for nonsupervisory workers still stinks).

Bonddad's Wednesday Linkfest

EU GDP + .65 M/M, 2.5% Y/Y (Eurostat)
EU IP -.6% M/M. +3.3% Y/Y (Eurostat)
UK annual inflation at 3% (ONS)
Dallas Fed chief considering December hike (FT)
The UK interest rate curve is inverted at the short-end (FT)
11 trillion of negative yielding  debt (FT)
US Set to become major oil producer (FT)
Yellen says markets expect too much guidance (Marketwatch)
Sydney welcomes "Ferry McFrryface" (AP)
LA imports up (CR)
Long-term job declines in US manufacturing (Econbrowser)

Wednesday, November 15, 2017

No, We Won't See a Torrent of Investment From the Tax Bill

One of the arguments that Republicans are using to support their tax bill is that it will unleash investment.  The data says otherwise.  Currently, most US economic sectors are operating far below maximum capacity utilization.

Let's start with manufacturing:

The top chart shows the CU rate for manufacturing while the bottom two charts break the data down into durable and non-durable subsets.  All three charts tell the same story: capacity utilization is at low historical levels.  Right now, it makes far more sense for companies to bring unused capacity back online rather than buy new equipment.

     Let's turn to computer manufacturing and electric utilities:

Both charts tell a similar story: CU is low.  

Mining is the only industry where a boost in investment is possible:

We see far more peaks and valleys.

The counter-argument is that spare capacity is outdated; as orders increase companies will be forced to add new, more modern capacity.  The problem with this argument is industrial production is actually very weak:

I broke the data down into its component pieces in this article over at TLR Analytics.  IP is the weakest of the coincident indicators this cycle.

In order to see an increase in CU, we need industrial production to pick-up.  And that's just not happening.   

Tuesday, November 14, 2017

A curious divergence between borrowing and lending

- by New Deal democrat

The Senior Loan Officer Survey for the third quarter was reported by the Fed last week.  There was a curious divergence between the willingness of banks to lend vs. that of firms to borrow.

This post is up at